Which of these factors is NOT considered when resolving alleged violations?

The factor that is not typically considered when resolving alleged violations is the past performance reviews of the licensee. In the context of regulatory enforcement, investigators primarily focus on the specifics of the current violation rather than the licensee's historical performance or behavior.

The severity of the violation, good faith of the licensee, and the impact of the violation on consumers are all critical elements in determining the appropriate response to an alleged violation. The severity indicates how serious the infraction is and helps in assessing potential penalties. Good faith reflects the intention and efforts a licensee has made to comply with regulations, which can mitigate consequences. The impact on consumers is crucial because it assesses the potential harm inflicted on those served, guiding regulators in protecting public interest.

In contrast, past performance reviews do not directly relate to the current circumstances surrounding the alleged violation. While they might inform a broader understanding of the licensee's behavior, they are not a decisive factor in the immediate resolution process for current infractions. This distinction emphasizes the focus on the current incident's specifics rather than historical performance when addressing regulatory issues.